<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sudoku. game version 1.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://easydaily.com/blog/sudoku-game-version-1-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://easydaily.com/blog/sudoku-game-version-1-0/</link>
	<description>EasyDaily.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:37:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SchizoWombat</title>
		<link>http://easydaily.com/blog/sudoku-game-version-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>SchizoWombat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://easydaily.com/blog/sudoku-game-version-1-0/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think that level 5 is easy at all
i DO think that level 8 is fairly impossible (i loaded one up that had 7 numbers across the entire board)

i built a program that solves these things - I put a level 5 puzzle in it and it solved in about 1.5 sec (normal), and i also put a level 8 in it and it locked up - it uses the same processes that i do when i do a puzzle (i modeled the logic after the logic i use to solve a sudoku) and it found that the puzzle was not possible to solve

so yeah, level 5 was great (i went back and did it myself and found it quite challenging) but some of the higher levels need some definite work - instead of reducing the amount of numbers that populate the puzzle, perhaps you should experiment with the combinations of numbers
for example, instead of having a puzzle that starts out with having, say, 5 1&#039;s, 4 2&#039;s, 1 3, 5 4&#039;s, etc, have it start out with like a max of 3 for any one number - that would keep the puzzle in the realm of possibility, but drastically increase the challenge of it

all in all, i&#039;m quite impressed - good job
if you want some more feedback, tips, whatever, just email me (make sure you put sudoku in the subject so i&#039;ll know who you are and don&#039;t delete it)

hope i helped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think that level 5 is easy at all<br />
i DO think that level 8 is fairly impossible (i loaded one up that had 7 numbers across the entire board)</p>
<p>i built a program that solves these things &#8211; I put a level 5 puzzle in it and it solved in about 1.5 sec (normal), and i also put a level 8 in it and it locked up &#8211; it uses the same processes that i do when i do a puzzle (i modeled the logic after the logic i use to solve a sudoku) and it found that the puzzle was not possible to solve</p>
<p>so yeah, level 5 was great (i went back and did it myself and found it quite challenging) but some of the higher levels need some definite work &#8211; instead of reducing the amount of numbers that populate the puzzle, perhaps you should experiment with the combinations of numbers<br />
for example, instead of having a puzzle that starts out with having, say, 5 1&#8217;s, 4 2&#8217;s, 1 3, 5 4&#8217;s, etc, have it start out with like a max of 3 for any one number &#8211; that would keep the puzzle in the realm of possibility, but drastically increase the challenge of it</p>
<p>all in all, i&#8217;m quite impressed &#8211; good job<br />
if you want some more feedback, tips, whatever, just email me (make sure you put sudoku in the subject so i&#8217;ll know who you are and don&#8217;t delete it)</p>
<p>hope i helped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
